Quick Description

Hate movie spoilers? Good! You'll get straight to the point, quick, and spoiler-free movie reviews to help you spend your time and money wisely on movies. I'll give you the Good, the Bad, the Reason, and the Rating about each movie. ***Please disable any popup blockers***

Saturday, July 9, 2016

Batman v Superman Ultimate Edition Movie Review

Click the pic to watch the video review
The Good:
Right off the bat, you'll notice that the story makes way more sense. It’s told in a much more chronological and cohesive manner. You'll also notice that many of the scenes were re-ordered in a much better sequence. The benefit of this was that the characters we developed in a much better way. We actually get a better sense of their motivations as well.

I appreciated Amy Adams (played "Lois Lane") so much more in this version. She's cracking cases like Sherlock Holmes and even reveals some insight as to why Superman couldn't stop that bomb.

As for Superman/Clark Kent, we found out that he wasn't so much of an emotional jerk after all. He followed up with the victims, and showed that he really did care. The theatrical version cut out many of the scenes that really dug into the moral dilemma of "who's good or bad" and "What's right or wrong". When someone stated that Superman was a hero, we didn't get to see much of the other side of that story questioning "Well who's hero is he really?" In a nut shell, the ultimate version made me actually care a little more about Superman's character.

On to Lex Luthor...Jr? Well they did a much better job of showing us more of Lex's plans and just how much he really was involved with the conflict between Batman and Superman. This definitely helped to add to his character's motivations and devious nature that we're all accustomed to. The scene where Lex is captured in the spaceship made way more sense as well, which was a much better setup for Darkseid's arrival.

The Bad:
If you had high hopes like me that there was going to be another intense action scene like Batman's final fight scene, then I'm sorry to tell you it's not happening. Many of the additional scenes were more so for the sake of filling in the plot, and not so much action packed visual delights.

I STILL think that Jesse Eisenberg's Lex was a fail overall. I don't think that using the alternate universe's version of "Alexander Luthor" (from the Crisis on Infinite Earths comic series) was a good move at all. This movie was made to be a commercial, and mainstream film. That means that only comic fans may catch that character difference while casual movie goers may be mystified as to why this version of Lex is so different. Also, I think that Lex's "insanity" would've made more sense had he simply gone crazy AFTER he started messing with the alien technology. (I HATE that jolly rancher scene) -_-

The Reason:
Batman V Superman was both a Win and a Fail at the same time. It primarily had only two goals. The first goal was to give us the two most iconic superheroes on the big screen while teasing the Justice League's existence. The second goal was to appeal to average movie goers AND comic fans alike.

With the studio panicking over the long run time and forcing Snyder to cut it short, I think the studio failed in the sense that the Ultimate version was obviously a better film. However, if they wanted to cut things out they should've just cut out Doomsday. And yes, I know, that would've meant Wonder Woman too. Honestly, I don't think all of her scenes were needed. Why? Because this was a setup movie. When we saw that awesome trailer for BvS, we didn't know Wonder Woman was going to be in it, and we LOVED it. She could've been teased like everyone else, and got us excited for her upcoming solo movie. Doomsday could've simply been teased.

Furthermore, I've been on record to say that Superman's death was incredibly premature. Such an event is not something you cram in the last 20 mins of an already bloated movie. That could've been saved for Man of Steel 2 where we could've focused and cared more.

Now Snyder also failed in the sense that no one told him to make a 4 hour movie. (yes it was originally going to be 4 hours!) As a director your job is to tell us your story but do it effectively.

Now to be fair, both the studios and Snyder still win. Studio gets Geoff Johns (awesome comic writer) to supervise all of their projects moving forward as an executive producer. They also added Ben Affleck to direct and executive produce some of their films as well. (This way they can reel in Snyder if he goes off the reservation again.) Snyder wins because he gets a second chance to direct the Justice League movies.

So I should also clear this up. My previous rating of Batman V Superman is now going to be reduced to just a 7/10. I will chalk this up to "fanlexia" (watch the video for a more detailed explanation.)
Overall, I believe that this ultimate edition is what should've hit theaters regardless of its time length. There wouldn't have been as much of a divide, in my opinion. Feel free to give it a watch and purchase or download as you see fit below.


Blu-ray Bonus Features:Thanks to Warner Bros. I also got an early look at the bonus features that will be included in the Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition, so to add to my final thoughts on the film he is a breakdown of what you will get with he Blu-Ray and how it will enhance your experience.

Reviewing the special features, we get a chance to take a look at some great previews of the rationale on who the justice members are. We’re then given a little more additional insight into why things like the "Martha connection” may be more important than some may think. If you loved Wonder Woman in the movie, then you’ll more than likely appreciate the background stories and the development of the character in general. (Probably one of my personal favorites of the special features.) I didn’t care as much for the Batmobile special feature, but if you’re a car-nut, you’ll probably appreciate it more. We definitely get to see just how deep Snyder’s love and intrigue for Superman and his moral complexity. For those of you who really want to nerd out, there’s a nice breakdown of the actual fight between Bats and Superman. However, it was a little disappointing in the sense that it ends a bit prematurely. I was looking forward to something that could salvage Lex’s character, and didn’t find it.

Overall, I’d say that if you really loved the theatrical and the Ultimate Edition then you’re probably the best candidate to really appreciate what the special bonus features have to offer. While I did enjoy the Ultimate Edition, I didn’t feel wow’d by most of the special features, however, I did like some of the background information presented, and more of the commentary rationales by the show’s writers. At this point, I’d probably say that simply watching the Ultimate Edition is more than enough of a payoff for those somewhat disappointed with the theatrical version. However, the bonus blu-ray features simply are simply just that: a bonus.
The Rating: 8.5/10


My [Loosely based] Ratings scale
10-9 = A Must watch at any cost. 
8.5- 7.5 = Theater worthy 
7-6.5 = Matinee/rental worthy at best
6 = Watchable (If it's free)
5 - below = Avoid at all costs



Enjoyed this review?  Share it and let me know what you thought.

Click Here
 to join our weekly email list. One email, every Friday, to get my latest reviews. Don't forget to follow me at @SpoilerDashFree

Hush (2016) Movie Review


 The Trailer:

The Good:
The film is the absolute perfect length. It doesn't waste time in setting up the story and getting straight into the meat of it all. As you can tell from the trailer, this is full of suspense. There were just a few scenes that didn't play out as you may expect. What I appreciated the most was how "Maddie" (Kate Siegel) did most things that anyone else in her situation would. The story was a slightly original twist on a classic "predator vs prey" style of thriller.

The Bad:
The story is pretty straight forward, and you can probably predict 85% of it. Maybe the last 10 mins of the movie is where it got the most interesting.

The Reason:
As you can see there really isn't that much to talk about with this film. It's something that I'd recommend watching on a weekend when there's nothing else to watch. It was cool, and I have no gripes about it. I wouldn't say it's too scary either, so don't worry having any heart attacks while watching. I could only find this on Netflix so if you've got it feel free to give it a look.

The Rating: 6.5/10

My [Loosely based] Ratings scale
10-9 = A Must watch at any cost. 
8.5- 7.5 = Theater worthy 
7-6.5 = Matinee/rental worthy at best
6 = Watchable (If it's free)
5 - below = Avoid at all costs



Enjoyed this review?  Share it and let me know what you thought.

Click Here
 to join our weekly email list. One email, every Friday, to get my latest reviews. Don't forget to follow me at @SpoilerDashFree

Monday, July 4, 2016

The Purge 3: Election Year

Support this site by clicking on this pic to buy your tickets
   The Trailer:

YouTube Review:

The Good: 
I loved the fact that they teased about how much the influence of the purge has spread. We only get to hear about this from a few characters, but it was nice to hear about. (I wish they wouldn't actually shown it rather than just mention how far it's spread).

Frank Grillo was just as good as he was in the last The Purge Anarchy (My Review), and continues to win as an action star in my book. Along with him, Mykelti Williamson (played "Joe") attempted to steal the spotlight with his off  handed, stereotypical comic relief. It was entertaining for the most part, but be prepared for some major eye rolling too.

The Bad: 
The writing overall seemed cheap, rushed, and underdeveloped. It felt like they just wanted to stretch what happened in Purge 2, rather than expand a richer story. In some cases, the story relied a little too much on just how demented people got with their creative purging.

It won't take you long to figure out that the characters were stereotypical and over the top; which led to them doing a lot of over acting. The bad guys were the most extreme bad guys you could think of, and the good people were as naive as ever. Some of it didn't even sound believable. Some of the lines the characters were saying were just ridiculous and were probably just in there for shock value.

There were other moments in the film that were simply unbelievable. The more you actually sit back and think about what was going on, the dumber the movie gets. Rather than keeping the serious tone that the previous Purge films had, this one tried too much to be comical. The sense of urgency, and suspense are just diminished as you can tell this film didn't take itself seriously at all.

The Reason: 
Overall, as a huge fan of the Purge films, Purge Election Year was a disappointment for me. They didn't even get that deep into the politics or any of the substantial impacts of what made the Purge so unique. This didn't even feel like the Purge 3; it was more like the Purge 2.5. If you want to see it, do it as a DISCOUNTED matinee at the very best. But don't be afraid to just wait for this and watch it at home. -_-

The Rating: 6.5/10
My [Loosely based] Ratings scale
10-9 = A Must watch at any cost. 
8.5- 7.5 = Theater worthy 
7-6.5 = Matinee/rental worthy at best
6 = Watchable (If it's free)
5 - below = Avoid at all costs



Enjoyed this review?  Share it and let me know what you thought.

Click Here
 to join our weekly email list. One email, every Friday, to get my latest reviews. Don't forget to follow me at @SpoilerDashFree

Saturday, July 2, 2016

The Legend of Tarzan Movie Review

Support this site by clicking the pic to buy your tickets.
The Trailer:

YouTube Video:

Movie Critic Reactions:

The Good:
You can tell right off the bat this movie was intentionally made to be seen in 3D. There are only one or two "in your face" moments with the 3D, but the biggest accomplishment of the 3D effects was to add depth to what you see. If you're afraid of heights, you may slightly hold your breath a few times during the great camera angles as Tarzan swings through the jungle.

Rather than giving us the same old Tarzan origin story, this film is a bit of a prequel and sequel all in one. We're reminded of Tarzan's past through periodic flashbacks. It was also nice how the majority of the film takes place with a more "civilized" Tarzan about a decade after leaving he jungle.

Alexander SkarsgÃ¥rd really looks and sounds the part (even though he wasn't given many lines). It's kind of hard to imagine anyone else playing a better Tarzan from this point.  Christoph Waltz (plays, "Leon Rom") delivers the great level of acting we've come to expect as the villain.  Samuel L. Jackson (who plays George Washington Williams) served as the entertaining comic relief of the film.

The action and fight scenes were also a highlight. It was cool to see Tarzan display his "wild" fighting style against animals or humans.

The Bad:
While Skarsgard and Jackson shared some nice on screen chemistry, there were moments where it simply felt a little cheesy. (Remember those corny lines from buddy-cop movies?) Besides that, we understand that Tarzan has a unique relationship with animals, but the ending seemed to push it a little too far in my opinion.

Now I don't know if this is truly a "Bad" or not, so you can decide for yourself. There is a bit of a concern as to whether this movie fell victim to playing the "White Savior" role yet again. I won't go into too much detail, but I will only say that IF the African Slave Trade was something that was highlighted in Tarzan novels, then there is no issue here at all. However, if Hollywood interjected slavery into this film, to prop up Tarzan, then that's a bit problematic in my opinion. (I have not read the novels so make of this point whatever you like.)

The Reason
:

I thought this was a good adaptation of the classic tale. It's probably fair to say that it's one of the best Tarzan films to date. I can't say that anything in this film necessarily wow'd me, but I was entertained the whole time. I saw the film in IMAX 3D, but I don't think it's nearly worth that much. I do think that if you plan on seeing it in theaters, then 3D would be ideal.

The Rating: 7.5/10


My [Loosely based] Ratings scale
10-9 = A Must watch at any cost. 
8.5- 7.5 = Theater worthy 
7-6.5 = Matinee/rental worthy at best
6 = Watchable (If it's free)
5 - below = Avoid at all costs



Enjoyed this review?  Share it and let me know what you thought.

Click Here
 to join our weekly email list. One email, every Friday, to get my latest reviews. Don't forget to follow me at @SpoilerDashFree

Friday, June 24, 2016

Independence Day: Resurgence Movie Review

Support this site by clicking the pic to buy your tickets.
The Trailer:

The Good:

Whether you decide to see this in 3D or not, it's fair to say that the visuals and action carry this movie more than anything. The level of destruction is taken up a few notches compared to the previous Independence Day (1996). The stakes are certainly raised and the threat of the alien attack no joke. It was intriguing to see the damage the aliens caused to the planet and the entire human race.

Credit goes to Jeff Goldblum ( played "David Levinson") and Bill Pullman (played former President Whitmore) for being probably the best vets from the previous movie. This may have been Liam Hemsworth's best performance to date. (Don't get too excited. This is more like an "Effort Award") However, my absolute favorite was Deobia Oparei (who played "Dikembe Umbutu"...or the badass with the double machetes) Both his character and story were soooo much more interesting than almost the entire movie. The entire time I wanted to know "How did he learn that?" ... "He did what to those aliens?"...."Why aren't more people asking Umbutu more questions?" Personally, I think that given the big time gap between the previous movie and this sequel, I think Umbutu's character's story arc would've been a great one to do a mini solo film. (Especially to get us all up to speed.)

I did appreciate what this movie set out to do, and the direction it's headed. I won't go into more detail than that to avoid any spoilers.

The Bad:
The movie spent maybe 30 mins too long consistently trying to play the "You Remember When" game. They were referring to characters and their past relationships as if we, the audience, were supposed to remember it all like it was yesterday (or 1996). For the most part, I really didn't even care about the nostalgia at all. It probably could've been easily summed up in one of those fake news reports in just 5 mins. Instead we're re-introduced to (literally) old characters who you may not even recognize unless you watch Independence Day (1996) right before seeing this sequel.

Furthermore, I wasn't sold on the character development of the new characters either. Liam Hemsworth and Jessie T. Usher didn't really seem to have the best on screen chemistry. Their backstory seemed random and just thrown in last minute just to give them an excuse to interact or have a past.

Other characters seemed unnecessary as well. Judd Hirsch, who plays Jeff Goldblum's character's dad, seem by far the most out of place. His attempt of being the comic relief barely even got a chuckle out of the audience at my showing. (It felt like maybe if you could identify from the Jewish parent stereotypes, then maybe the jokes will resonate more with you than others.)

Lastly, there were very little, if any, surprises in the plot. This was pretty predictable. If you pay attention and listen closely, you'll probably guess the direction of the movie's ending very early on. You still want to see how it plays out, but it just takes a little bit of the edge off in terms of the climax.

The Reason:
Had this sequel came out in 1998 (with Will Smith) it would've been an AWESOME film. Had it came out in 2006 (with or without Will Smith), it would've been a pretty good film. Coming out 20 years later put a little bit too much of a strain on this film. It's now just a "Very Okay" movie. A lot of this stuff we've seen, and only some of it we haven't in other films. You could probably think of this sequel as "Aliens + Starship Troopers".

Despite the visuals, I think you'll be fine if you skipped on the 3D. The 3D doesn't make or break the movie. I think this is worth seeing in theaters just because they do throw a lot of action your way and it is very nice to see it all on the big screen. I'd probably go in with low expectations. I don't think there's anything in this movie that will blow you away or having you leaving the theaters thinking it was "epic". As I said, it's a good movie that's just a little too late to the party.

The Rating: 7/10

My [Loosely based] Ratings scale
10-9 = A Must watch at any cost. 
8.5- 7.5 = Theater worthy 
7-6.5 = Matinee/rental worthy at best
6 = Watchable (If it's free)
5 - below = Avoid at all costs



Enjoyed this review?  Share it and let me know what you thought.

Click Here
 to join our weekly email list. One email, every Friday, to get my latest reviews. Don't forget to follow me at @SpoilerDashFree